Grab My HeartThe people who make a life

Repair & Conflict

Deciding a friendship is not worth repairing

Not every rupture should be mended, and the writing about friendship rarely says so. How to make the decision deliberately rather than by drifting into it.

Side view of plump African American and black man in sportswear looking at each other while standing on snowy ground during workout
Photograph by Julia Larson via Pexels
Editorial note. Independent reporting and analysis. Nothing here is sponsored or paid for. How we work.

This works through ending a friendship deliberately in the order the parts actually depend on each other.

The short version

  • Some friendships cost more to maintain than they return, and that is a legitimate finding.
  • A deliberate ending is usually kinder than an indefinite fade.
  • The decision should be made outside the argument that prompted it.

Permission to conclude it

Most writing about friendship assumes that repair is the goal and treats an ending as a failure, which is not always accurate. People change, circumstances diverge and some friendships become a net cost to one or both parties over a period of years. Concluding that a relationship is not worth the effort is a legitimate judgement, and it does not require anybody to have behaved badly.

It is also different from a rupture, since many of these endings involve two people who simply no longer suit each other. Making the decision consciously produces a better outcome than arriving at it through six years of unreturned messages.

Deciding at the right moment

The worst time to decide is during or immediately after an argument, when the material is vivid and the assessment is distorted. A better test is how you feel about the friendship on an ordinary week, since the answer then is a more reliable guide.

At the kitchen table, consider the trend across a couple of years rather than the current state, as most friendships have bad periods that pass. Ask whether you would seek this person out if you met them now, which is a clarifying and slightly brutal question. Give a serious friendship at least one honest conversation before concluding anything, since a surprising number of these are fixable.

The questions worth asking

Does the friendship leave you better or worse after most meetings, judged over months rather than after any single occasion? Has the imbalance in effort ever run in the other direction, or has it been one-way for the entire history?

Is the difficulty about capability, which can be planned around, or about how you are treated, which usually cannot? Have you ever said what the problem is, plainly, and given them a real opportunity to respond to it? Would you be relieved if they cancelled, and if the answer has been yes for two years, that is a finding.

Ending it without an announcement

Most friendships are ended by reduction rather than declaration, and for ordinary divergence that is the appropriate method. Reduce gradually, continue to be warm when you do meet, and let the frequency settle at whatever level you can sustain honestly.

Across a decade, avoid the sudden total withdrawal, since an abrupt disappearance is genuinely painful and invites an explanation you may not want to give. Answer messages, briefly, because a person who is being faded on and knows it deserves that much.

This method leaves the relationship recoverable, which matters more often than people expect.

When to say something

A formal ending is warranted where a fade would be cruel, where you have been close enough that silence would be inexplicable, or where they will keep asking. Keep it short and about the relationship rather than about their deficiencies, since a list of faults serves nobody. Do not do it in writing if you can avoid it, unless writing is necessary for your own safety or clarity.

Expect to be asked for reasons and decide in advance how much you are willing to say. Accept that they may be angry, and that their reaction does not determine whether the decision was correct.

Afterwards

Ending a long friendship produces a grief that people are unprepared for, since there is no recognised category for it. There is often no ritual, no acknowledgement from others and no obvious way to talk about it, which makes it harder than it needs to be.

Across a decade, mutual friends complicate matters, and being explicit with them about not wanting to discuss it is usually better than leaving it ambiguous. Expect to reconsider, particularly in the first year, and treat reconsideration as normal rather than as evidence of a mistake. Some of these decisions are reversed years later with good results, so leaving the door unlocked costs nothing.

The takeaway

Make the decision on an ordinary week rather than in the week after an argument, because only one of those gives you a reliable answer.

Friendship is largely turning up, repeatedly, when there is no occasion for it.

Questions readers ask

Is it cruel to fade rather than say something?

For an ordinary divergence it is the normal and usually kindest method. For a close friendship, silence with no explanation is harder to receive than a short conversation.

How do I know if I am giving up too early?

Ask whether you have ever said plainly what the problem is. Very few friendships have had that conversation, and a fair number improve once they do.

Repair & Conflictendingsdecisionsrepair
More in Repair & Conflict
Rehan Siddiqui
Contributing writer, Grab My Heart

Rehan writes about conflict and repair, and thinks apologies are a skill.

Also by Rehan Siddiqui